— Bud Norman
— Bud Norman
— Bud Norman
All we know about the death of Trayvon Martin is what we read in the news, and much of what appears in the news often turns out to be wrong. The only pertinent facts known with any certainty are: That on Feb. 26 Martin was shot to death in Sanford, Fla., by a man named George Zimmerman; Martin was unarmed; Zimmerman was not arrested at the scene; and it was tragic.
These few facts clearly warrant an investigation by the proper local and state authorities, perhaps even federal law enforcement officials, and if the results of that investigation prove damning to Zimmerman he should answer to whatever charges are called for and face whatever punishment is proscribed by law. A lynch mob is not warranted, even by the additional facts that Martin was a young black man and Zimmerman is not.
Given the unhappy state of race relations in America, however, it was predictable that something akin to a lynch mob would develop. The Rev. Al Sharpton, whose incendiary rhetoric preceded the murderous pogrom in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights section in 1991 and a fatal fire at a Harlem clothing store in 1995, has led rallies demanding an arrest and conviction. Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan has “tweeted” to his followers that “Soon and very soon, the law of retaliation may very well be applied,” adding that “You must get up and do it for yourself.” Taking the advice to heart, the New Black Panther Party has reportedly offered a $10,000 payment for the “capture” of Zimmerman. Anyone seeking to collect the reward can consult the “tweets” of filmmaker Spike Lee, who posted Zimmerman’s address and asked his followers to pass it along through the Internet. Several did, adding threats with explicitly racial language.
In each case the calls for revenge are couched as a demand for justice, but mobs and intimidation are never conducive to justice.
Justice can only be based on the truth, and at this point none of these men can possibly know all the relevant facts. The infamous Tawana Brawley hoax that Sharpton helped to perpetrate, the rush to convict the Duke University lacrosse team on rape charge that were later disproved, and countless other racially-charged controversies that turned out to be something very than what was originally reported should serve as caution against premature conclusions. Already stories are appearing the press that mention a witness who saw Martin on top of Zimmerman, and physical evidence corroborating that the claim, as well as friends who vouch that Zimmerman had no animus toward any race and was on good terms with black family members. Even if true those stories don’t necessarily exonerate Zimmerman, but they could lead to a lesser charge than murder, and at this point it will take a courageous prosecutor to bring charges that fail to satisfy the growing mob.
— Bud Norman
This column is being written on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and is therefore racist. That would seem to be the message, at least, of the group in Burlington, Vermont, that protested a bank for being open on the holiday.
Working on Monday wasn’t our only racist act of the week. While attempting to purchase our weekly apres-church donuts at a local Mexican bakery on Sunday we were asked for some spare change by a man who appeared to be African-American, and we obliged him with a couple of quarters. According to one of the talking heads at CNN, who criticized Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for giving $50 to an African-American woman who had told him about her recent financial hardships, such largess “only plays into every sort of patronizing stereotype of black people.”
Racism is becoming ever harder to avoid, judging by other stories we’ve encountered in the news. During Monday night’s presidential debate in South Carolina the moderator Juan Williams charged former House Speaker New Gingrich with racism for decrying the record rate of food stamp usage during the Obama administration and suggesting that poor children of all races should be allowed part time jobs. We have never associated food stamps and poverty exclusively with minorities, and apparently our failure to do so is racist.
In case you’ve been wondering why the United States Department of Justice would intentionally allow Mexican drug gangs to purchase hundreds of weapons, at least one of which wound up killing an American law enforcement officer, please be advised that such questions are also racist. Attorney General Eric Holder helpfully explained to the New York Times that congressional critics of the “Fast and Furious” operation are motivated by animus toward him and the president “due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that we’re both African-American.”
More than three years into the current administration the unemployment rate for black men is 19 percent and the net worth of black households has declined 53 percent, but any suggestion that a change of policies might be called for is also deemed racist by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Florida congresswoman who moonlights as the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee. The Democratic Party remains the “natural home” of minorities, Schultz told Bill Maher’s audience of trained seals, because “Republicans shun them.”
— Bud Norman